Thorsten Behrens wrote:
You've hit the point exactly. There are some rules that require consistency and easy discernibility of local and member variables, and that's about all that needs to be said about that. Whether a member starts with m_ or with ma is largely irrelevant - as long as it is used consistently (module boundaries would be a natural border here). Historically, OOo modules differ on that, to some extent, and it would be IMO be a waste of time to enforce one single naming scheme.
Historically, modules also differ on a lot of other subjects. That's why we need these guidelines in the first place.
A little bit of naming convention is certainly needed. Nobody wants to see a mixture of
Foo aFoo(maFoo); CFoo foo(_foo); foo f_(f); even if it's in different modules. Niklas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
