Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
Also, variable naming scheme is not specified. Is that intended? I'm personally of the opinion that variable naming style is best left to the developers. So, if it's intentionally left out, I'd welcome it,
Yes, it's intentionally left out. IMHO, if one tries to standardize things that are not really necessary, that would lessen the appreciation for the standards that are necessary. So we tried to leave out everything that does not really matter.
As for naming schemes: Readability is important. How it is reached - there are many good ways. And as Thorsten wrote, consistency within module boundaries seems to be good enough.
Nikolai --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
