Hi Niklas, you wrote: > Historically, modules also differ on a lot of other subjects. That's > why we need these guidelines in the first place. > Granted - but in my book, at least something like maName vs. m_aName needn't be standardized, just because we're standardizing on other stuff.
> A little bit of naming convention is certainly needed. Nobody wants to > see a mixture of > Foo aFoo(maFoo); > CFoo foo(_foo); > foo f_(f); > even if it's in different modules. > OK - so, what naming scheme would you propose? Cheers, -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
