Rüdiger Timm schrieb: > binfilter isn't static. During the last months even more code has been > moved from f.e. sw into binfilter.
Yes. Because we discovered even more filters we don't want to maintain anymore. :-) >> I think the problem is that you can't give a fixed order for 2,3 and 4. >> This must be checked for every single case. Perhaps Kay should point >> this out in the wiki. > OK, accepted. But from my point of view we should not make 'move more > basic code into binfilter' (2 or 3) a default before 'adapt binfilter to > the changes' (4). I even doubt that (4) in general is more effort than (3). Agreed. Perhaps we should give all three options the same priority and make it clear that it is an individual decision based on trade-off considerations. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]