On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > I'm not sure if we need a M5. > > Current code quality is already pretty fine and 1.0.0 from my understanding > would mean being feature complete and (almost) passing the TCK. I would then > go on and quarterly > release 1.0.1, 1.0.2 as bugfix versions.
Not only almost. Needs to be 100% passing TCK. Otherwise => 1.0.0-alpha-n (or like now M, for milestone). -Matthias > > So I'd say we should stick to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Thu, 1/21/10, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > >> From: Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >> Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 11:46 AM >> 2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>: >> >>>>I feel we should not continue to use the >> "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" version number >> >>>>Do you agree ? >> > >> > * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. >> > * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use >> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. >> > >> > We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be >> there after M5. After >> > releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in >> our modules. >> > >> > Any other ideas? >> >> what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? >> That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the >> current >> direction is, IMO >> >> Regarding the 1.0.0 is out after M5, is there a roadmap or >> so ? >> >> Once the "official" 1.0.0 is out, using the 1.0.x-SNAPSHOT >> pattern is fine. >> I agree :-) >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> > >> > --Gurkan >> > >> > 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf >> <mat...@apache.org> >> yazdı: >> > >> >> I agree with you. >> >> >> >> +1 on a new release. >> >> >> >> Minor things: >> >> -after the release, I feel we should not continue >> to use the >> >> "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" version number >> >> Do you agree ? >> >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu >> <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi folks, >> >> > >> >> > It has been lots of corrections and bug >> resolutions after our M3 release. >> >> I want to release M4 version, because current code >> base is the most mature >> >> and covers lots of specification requirements. I >> would like to re-solve >> >> issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 >> release beginning of the >> >> next week. >> >> > >> >> > I am very happy that this will be the our >> first release while living as a >> >> TLP. >> >> > >> >> > WDYT? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks; >> >> > >> >> > --Gurkan >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> ___________________________________________________________________ >> >> > Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr >> >> > İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! >> Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Gurkan Erdogdu >> > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
