The 'rc1' versus 'RC1' debate. The original email uses the 'rc1' naming because that what was used during building the artifacts.
The release process was shared and noone commented on it. It has 'rc1' in it. https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-site/wiki/Pekko-Release-Process It took me 90 minutes to get the release candidate ready and I'm not very willing to start the whole process again over a minor difference in opinion in the name of the version. If the general consensus is to use 'RC' - we can use that in future release candidates, eg RC2. If everyone starts -1 voting in this thread, I guess the 'rc1' will need to be abandoned and a new RC2 done at some point in the future. I do not see any reason why the version name '1.0.0-rc1' should prevent people from validating this release candidate. When we get approval to release, the artifacts will be rebuilt and named as '1.0.0' anyway. On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 11:08, PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Pekko Community, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko(incubating) version > 1.0.0-rc1. > > The discussion thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/xd4wp77bdwyll9243mnd9qc6j4d122kr > > The release candidate: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pekko/1.0.0-rc1/ > > This release has been signed with a PGP key available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pekko/1.0.0-rc1/KEYS > > Release Notes: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pekko/1.0.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES-1.0.0.txt > > Git branch for the release: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/tree/v1.0.0-rc1 > Git commit ID: 6e40dee37bbbf847eb0e83e7e5bf4596d67b2b53 > > Please download, verify, and test. > > We have also staged jars in the Apache Nexus Repository. These were > built with the same code as appears in this Source Release Candidate. > We would appreciate if users could test with these too. > > If anyone finds any serious problems with these jars, please also > notify us on this thread. > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/pekko/ > > In sbt, you can add this resolver. > > resolvers += "Apache Pekko Staging" at > "https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging"; > > > The VOTE will pass if we have more positive votes than negative votes > and there must be a minimum of 3 positive votes. > > Anyone voting in favour of the release, could you please provide a > list of the checks you have done? > > The vote will be left open until 23:59 UTC on 22 June 2023. > > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > To learn more about Apache Pekko, please see https://pekko.apache.org/ > > > Checklist for reference: > [ ] Download links are valid. > [ ] Checksums and signatures. > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist > [ ] No unexpected binary files > [ ] All source files have ASF headers > [ ] Can compile from source > > > To compile from the source, please refer to: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/blob/main/README.md#building-from-source > > Some notes about verifying downloads can be found at: > > https://pekko.apache.org/download.html#verifying-downloads > > > Here is my +1. > > Thanks, > PJ Fanning (Apache Pekko PPMC member and Apache Incubator PMC member) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
