My take is that

   - The name is not critical to the evaluation and should not result in a
   new RC by itself.
   - Future versions will use RC (uppercase) and documentation will be
   updated.

@Matthew Benedict de Detrich <[email protected]> is it possible to
do your dependent project testing by simply renaming your local copy?

Claude

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 2:33 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am not cancelling or changing this release candidate. There are no
> proven issues. If proven issues arise they will be dealt with.
>
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 14:28, Matthew Benedict de Detrich
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > As I stated before, I do not intend to cancel this vote and do a new
> > release candidate.
> >
> > I think that Justin's point is that you don't need to cancel the vote if
> > all you are doing is just renaming the source dist/artifacts (if you
> choose
> > to do so).
> >
> > > There is no proof of any issues with the git tag. I would appeal that
> > it is left alone unless it is proven to cause problems.
> >
> > If there is an issue it wouldn't be noticed in Pekko core because it's
> the
> > root
> > dependency, it's in the custom code/regex's that we have in Pekkos
> > modules when resolving artifacts from repositories.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 2:52 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Apologie, I meant :
> > >
> > > As I stated before, I do not intend to cancel this vote and do a new
> > > release candidate.
> > >
> > > Sorry for the confusion.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 13:51, PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Justin for clarifying that.
> > > >
> > > > As I stated before, I do intend to cancel this vote and do a new
> > > > release candidate.
> > > >
> > > > If the release candidate is voted down then we can do another release
> > > > candidate when all issues reported about it are addressed.
> > > >
> > > > There is no proof of any issues with the git tag. I would appeal that
> > > > it is left alone unless it is proven to cause problems.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 13:43, Justin Mclean <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > The no ASF requirement re naming "rc" vs "RC". If the project
> decided
> > > to change the name, it wouldn't change the hashes, so IMO, there would
> be
> > > no need for a new release candidate.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > Justin
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthew de Detrich
> >
> > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
> >
> > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
> >
> > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
> >
> > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
> >
> > *m:* +491603708037
> >
> > *w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to