On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/10/2010 06:21 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: >> >> This effort needs to be vendor neutral to encourage participation from >> a wider audience, as such it's not appropriate to host in under Qpid >> or ActiveMQ. > > What do you mean by 'vendor neutral'? How are either Qpid or ActiveMQ > 'vendors'? They are surely open source projects, collaborations that both > aim to be as inclusive as possible.
Good point, Gordon ;-). Well, I guess my thought is that because each project will provide a broker implementation of the AMQP spec that neither is appropriate for a neutral protocol level client that is not specific to either broker. The Apache Commons HTTP Client could have been hosted as a subproject to the HTTPD server project, but that wasn't appropriate so it was made a separate project. The same logic applies in this case. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org