Jewel is another reason.

Carlos wrote a lot of blog posts which can’t be run until we release.

(Plus lots of little things that were fixed…)

> On Sep 19, 2018, at 11:26 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I personally express important reason. Releasing can help community around
> VSCode and Moonshine.
> 
> Piotr
> 
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 9:41 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> What do you see as the important reasons?  I know the Apache mantra is to
>> release early and often, but if it were up to me, we would release after we
>> hit some interesting milestone, like getting Alina's app to compile
>> completely, or someone else says they are ready to go to production and
>> need a released version of Royale.  There are some bugs blocking users that
>> I would rather get done before releasing.
>> 
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/19/18, 10:34 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>    I’m happy to try and be a release manager, but I don’t have time for
>> at least a month. I think it’s pretty important to get this release out
>> sooner rather than later.
>> 
>>    If you can help Piotr finish this release, I’ll try to do the 0.9.5
>> release.
>> 
>>    Thanks,
>>    Harbs
>> 
>>> On Sep 19, 2018, at 6:54 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Piotr,
>>> 
>>> In my previous email, I was trying to say that you don't need to run
>> update.versions because I already did.
>>> In that and even earlier emails, we discussed running make_branches
>> twice.  IMO, you are getting the right results by running make_branches.
>> Given the current state of the repo, running make_branches once will set
>> the develop branch to 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT and the release branch to 0.9.3.
>> That's because that's how Maven works. The current poms in develop are set
>> to 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT.  Maven removes the "SNAPSHOT" in the release branch and
>> bumps the version in the develop branch.
>>> 
>>> I think you can just run make_branches again and it should create a
>> release branch with 0.9.4 and bump the develop branch to 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT.
>> That would be what we want.
>>> If you want me to help more, I will take the time to do so.  I can:
>>> -Get the repos to the point where the current scripts should "just
>> work".
>>> -Make sure make_branches works and is complete.
>>> -Do all of the other steps.
>>> 
>>> I still think it is important that someone else besides me can run
>> the scripts and generate a release.  So I would prefer to just get the
>> repos ready so that you can try running the scripts.  If there are
>> important things you've learned that other RMs will need to know, please
>> try to capture them in the wiki document.
>>> 
>>> @Carlos, I have spent a lot of time trying to automate releasing.
>> As Piotr said, skipping a version wasn't planned for and I hope it won't
>> ever happen again.  Unless you've actually looked at the scripts and read
>> the wiki document and tried it, saying you think there are too many manual
>> steps is not only wrong, but discouraging to those who have put effort into
>> it.  If you really think it needs to be better automated, then do it
>> yourself.  Don’t expect others to do things for you when you make negative
>> comments about their work.  I have other things I want to work on other
>> than release automation.  Release automation is only going to be "good
>> enough" and always in need of improvement.  We've only done two releases
>> and we are still debugging the scripts.   Join the effort instead of
>> complaining about it.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 9/19/18, 7:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org
>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>   Hi Piotr,
>>> 
>>>   sorry to hear that, I think we're out of resources. I'm
>> concentrating in
>>>   make Jewel as stable as possible since in few days we can start a
>> new
>>>   project with Royale-Jewel, so I still don't know how I'll be
>> doing to
>>>   continuer Jewel, make that project and continue with my other
>> tasks that my
>>>   position require.
>>> 
>>>   Maybe others could take this opportunity to make this happen
>>> 
>>>   Thanks
>>> 
>>>   Carlos
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   El mié., 19 sept. 2018 a las 13:58, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>   piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>>> 
>>>> Btw. The process is quite automatic, but skipping the version wasn't
>>>> something considered before.
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 1:31 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Carlos,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Unfortunately I'm giving up doing that. I have spent on this too
>> much
>>>> time
>>>>> and money. Someone else can continue from my point.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dev branch is setup to 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT. Even with detailed
>> instruction
>>>> from
>>>>> Alex I don't know what to do next.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Details are in previous email.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Good Luck!
>>>>> Piotr
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 1:15 PM Carlos Rovira <
>> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I encourage you and Alex to try to refine more the process so we
>> can
>>>>>> release more easily. I think right now the process is very
>> dependent of
>>>>>> many manual tasks, and that impact in all: huge effort to do the
>>>> release,
>>>>>> many time involved, impossible to reproduce in next release,..
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think this effort you're doing could be maybe the most
>> important right
>>>>>> now in Royale.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Maybe you could ask for some help to other Apache teams, maybe
>> infra
>>>>>> people?, or maven people?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for taking over this
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> El mié., 19 sept. 2018 a las 11:16, Olaf Krueger (<
>> m...@olafkrueger.net
>>>>> )
>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> All of that things are complex because we need to skip one
>>>> version...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Would it be possible to create something like a fake release
>> v0.9.3?
>>>>>>> Just to satisfy all those tools and automatism?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Olaf
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sent from:
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d3d7117c0674d3cb62408d61e56194a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636729752480155310&amp;sdata=y%2FoyOnG99mereYy0UODSZs%2B9wWCQdZ2CEUDVw%2BCMHMo%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d3d7117c0674d3cb62408d61e56194a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636729752480155310&amp;sdata=y%2FoyOnG99mereYy0UODSZs%2B9wWCQdZ2CEUDVw%2BCMHMo%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>>>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d3d7117c0674d3cb62408d61e56194a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636729752480165315&amp;sdata=liaR9S%2FYcT9xUbaRRwwRHk3EtmyzA8laM%2BrcCV5bmD4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d3d7117c0674d3cb62408d61e56194a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636729752480165315&amp;sdata=liaR9S%2FYcT9xUbaRRwwRHk3EtmyzA8laM%2BrcCV5bmD4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   --
>>>   Carlos Rovira
>>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d3d7117c0674d3cb62408d61e56194a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636729752480165315&amp;sdata=liaR9S%2FYcT9xUbaRRwwRHk3EtmyzA8laM%2BrcCV5bmD4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d3d7117c0674d3cb62408d61e56194a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636729752480165315&amp;sdata=liaR9S%2FYcT9xUbaRRwwRHk3EtmyzA8laM%2BrcCV5bmD4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to