Release notes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNotes9_4_1
I made some small structural adjustments to the release notes. I prefer to put the CHANGES link last so that you start reading the highlights and then end with the CHANGES link for further details. Since this is a patch release, I chose not to get into much details in the release highlights. People can read CHANGES.txt for the details. Ishan, SOLR-17112 had no PR so nothing to merge, so it will miss this release unless you are super fast or there is another RC. On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 2:23 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > Done > > Jan > > > 7. jan. 2024 kl. 07:03 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>: > > > > Sure; thanks. > > > >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:29 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Should we include this bugfix? > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16203 > >> I'm merging to branch_9x now... > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>>> 5. jan. 2024 kl. 17:14 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>: > >>> > >>> 9.4.1 is unblocked; bug fixes are now on the release branch. I plan to > >>> pursue a RC soon (today/tomorrow). This is my first time. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:53 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on > >> track > >>>> again. Normally it only files new PRs on Sundays, but I'm triggering > >> that > >>>> manually now to consider what other upgrades from the past month that > we > >>>> should put into 9.4.1. > >>>> > >>>> Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/solr/pulls/solrbot > and > >>>> consider which ones should be merged and backported. > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>>> > >>>>> 8. des. 2023 kl. 14:59 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com > >: > >>>>> > >>>>> I renamed that job to add "(Crave)" > >>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x%20(Crave)/ > >> and > >>>>> disabled it. I then I created a new job copied from the > >>>> "Solr-check-main" > >>>>> but branch_9x. Builds are hourly so we'll see how it goes. > >>>>> > >>>>> ~ David > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is > also > >>>> not > >>>>>> running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jan > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley < > david.w.smi...@gmail.com > >>> : > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I've been working with Uv on these glitches. > >>>>>>> ~ David > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the > number > >> of > >>>>>>>> known CVEs down. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but > >>>>>>>> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Run cd > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr > >>>>>>>>> Selecting project Solr (id:39) > >>>>>>>>> Error: Process completed with exit code 1. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Jan > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley < > >> david.w.smi...@gmail.com > >>>>> : > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will > >> happen > >>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>> there are a couple security matters we're looking at. > >>>>>>>>> ~ David > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh < > >>>>>>>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the > >>>> bin/solr > >>>>>>>> post > >>>>>>>>>> command. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c > >> tech > >>>>>>>>>> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url > >>>>>>>> parameter. > >>>>>>>>>> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c > >>>>>>>> parameter, > >>>>>>>>>> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski < > >>>> gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most > >>>> sense > >>>>>>>>>>> there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got > >>>>>> thoughts! > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl < > >> jan....@cominvent.com> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients? > >>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in > the > >>>>>> binary > >>>>>>>>>>>> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them > >>>> "internal" > >>>>>>>>>> only > >>>>>>>>>>>> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only > >>>> dog-fooding? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jan > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski < > >>>>>> gerlowsk...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our > new > >>>>>>>> Python > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the > >>>>>> release, > >>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing > >> the > >>>>>> new > >>>>>>>>>>>>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and > >> I'd > >>>>>>>> hate > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are > >> likely > >>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> crop > >>>>>>>>>>>> up. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish > >>>> timeframe? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get > in > >>>> the > >>>>>>>> way > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a > >> 9.4.1 > >>>>>> even > >>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether > there's a > >>>>>>>> willing > >>>>>>>>>>>> RM > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for 9.4.1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl < > >>>> jan....@cominvent.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that > >>>> unknown > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a > >> much > >>>>>>>> easier > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is > >>>> always > >>>>>>>>>> room > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer > features, > >>>> we > >>>>>>>>>> don't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to > release, > >> in > >>>>>> my > >>>>>>>>>>>> mind it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or > that > >>> 2 > >>>>>>>>>> months > >>>>>>>>>>>> has > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley < > >>>>>>>> david.w.smi...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one > >> issue... > >>>>>>>> but I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we > >> are. > >>>>>>>> But > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> really > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; > >>>> doing a > >>>>>>>>>> patch > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an > unfortunate > >>>>>> bug. > >>>>>>>>>> It > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was > >> just > >>>>>>>>>> helping > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone fix their problem. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit > >> on > >>>>>> Solr > >>>>>>>>>>>> 9.5, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches > the > >>>>>> index > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> format > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~ David > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey > >>>>>>>>>>>> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I > >>>> would > >>>>>>>>>>>> prefer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as > >> that > >>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something > >> that > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> author > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install > >> that > >>>>>>>> gets > >>>>>>>>>>>> its > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't > >>>> given > >>>>>>>> me > >>>>>>>>>>>> any > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trouble. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shawn > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> _______________________ > >>>>>>>>>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | > >>>>>> 434.466.1467 | > >>>>>>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > >>>>>>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > >>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > >>>>>>>>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is > considered > >>>> to > >>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, > >> regardless > >>>> of > >>>>>>>>>> whether attachments are marked as such. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >
