I've been working with Uv on these glitches.
~ David
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number of
> known CVEs down.
>
> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but
> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests:
>
> > Run cd
> /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr
> > Selecting project Solr (id:39)
> > Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
>
> Jan
>
> > 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will happen as
> > there are a couple security matters we're looking at.
> > ~ David
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh <
> ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the bin/solr
> post
> >> command.
> >>
> >> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech
> >> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url
> parameter.
> >> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c
> parameter,
> >> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date.
> >>
> >> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change.
> >>
> >>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most sense
> >>> there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got thoughts!
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients?
> >>>> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the binary
> >>>> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them "internal"
> >> only
> >>>> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only dog-fooding?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jan
> >>>>
> >>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new
> Python
> >>>> and
> >>>>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the release,
> >> or
> >>>>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing the new
> >>>>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd
> hate
> >> to
> >>>>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely to
> >> crop
> >>>> up.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish timeframe?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in the
> way
> >>>> of
> >>>>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1 even
> >>>> with
> >>>>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a
> willing
> >>>> RM
> >>>>> for 9.4.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that unknown
> >>>>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much
> easier
> >>>>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users.
> >>>>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is always
> >> room
> >>>>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features, we
> >> don't
> >>>>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in my
> >>>> mind it
> >>>>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2
> >> months
> >>>> has
> >>>>>> passed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley <
> david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> >>> :
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue...
> but I
> >>>>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are.
> But
> >>>>>> really
> >>>>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a
> >> patch
> >>>>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate bug.
> >> It
> >>>>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just
> >> helping
> >>>>>>> someone fix their problem.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on Solr
> >>>> 9.5,
> >>>>>> so
> >>>>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches the index
> >>>>>> format
> >>>>>>> BTW.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ~ David
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey
> >>>> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would
> >>>> prefer
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that for
> >>>>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that the
> >>>> author
> >>>>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that
> gets
> >>>> its
> >>>>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't given
> me
> >>>> any
> >>>>>>>> trouble.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Shawn
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> _______________________
> >> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> >> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> >> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> >>
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> >
> >>
> >> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> >> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> >> whether attachments are marked as such.
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>
