I've been working with Uv on these glitches. ~ David
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number of > known CVEs down. > > I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but > unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests: > > > Run cd > /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr > > Selecting project Solr (id:39) > > Error: Process completed with exit code 1. > > Jan > > > 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <[email protected]>: > > > > Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will happen as > > there are a couple security matters we're looking at. > > ~ David > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the bin/solr > post > >> command. > >> > >> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech > >> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url > parameter. > >> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c > parameter, > >> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date. > >> > >> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change. > >> > >>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most sense > >>> there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got thoughts! > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients? > >>>> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the binary > >>>> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them "internal" > >> only > >>>> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only dog-fooding? > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>>> > >>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <[email protected] > >: > >>>>> > >>>>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new > Python > >>>> and > >>>>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the release, > >> or > >>>>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing the new > >>>>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd > hate > >> to > >>>>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely to > >> crop > >>>> up. > >>>>> > >>>>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish timeframe? > >>>>> > >>>>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in the > way > >>>> of > >>>>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1 even > >>>> with > >>>>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a > willing > >>>> RM > >>>>> for 9.4.1 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that unknown > >>>>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much > easier > >>>>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users. > >>>>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is always > >> room > >>>>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features, we > >> don't > >>>>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in my > >>>> mind it > >>>>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2 > >> months > >>>> has > >>>>>> passed. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jan > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley < > [email protected] > >>> : > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue... > but I > >>>>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are. > But > >>>>>> really > >>>>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a > >> patch > >>>>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate bug. > >> It > >>>>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just > >> helping > >>>>>>> someone fix their problem. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on Solr > >>>> 9.5, > >>>>>> so > >>>>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches the index > >>>>>> format > >>>>>>> BTW. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ~ David > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey > >>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote: > >>>>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would > >>>> prefer > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that for > >>>>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that the > >>>> author > >>>>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that > gets > >>>> its > >>>>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't given > me > >>>> any > >>>>>>>> trouble. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>> Shawn > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> _______________________ > >> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | > >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > >> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > >> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > >> > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw > > > >> > >> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > >> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of > >> whether attachments are marked as such. > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
