WRT the possibility of 9.5 I think the deadlock in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17060 should be a blocker for
9.5. If others agree we can mark it for that...

On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:55 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:

> SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on track
> again. Normally it only files new PRs on Sundays, but I'm triggering that
> manually now to consider what other upgrades from the past month that we
> should put into 9.4.1.
>
> Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/solr/pulls/solrbot and
> consider which ones should be merged and backported.
>
> Jan
>
> > 8. des. 2023 kl. 14:59 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > I renamed that job to add "(Crave)"
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x%20(Crave)/ and
> > disabled it.  I then I created a new job copied from the
> "Solr-check-main"
> > but branch_9x.  Builds are hourly so we'll see how it goes.
> >
> > ~ David
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is also
> not
> >> running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave..
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> I've been working with Uv on these glitches.
> >>> ~ David
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number of
> >>>> known CVEs down.
> >>>>
> >>>> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but
> >>>> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Run cd
> >>>>
> >>
> /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr
> >>>>> Selecting project Solr (id:39)
> >>>>> Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jan
> >>>>
> >>>>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> >:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sounds good Eric.  It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will happen
> >> as
> >>>>> there are a couple security matters we're looking at.
> >>>>> ~ David
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh <
> >>>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the
> bin/solr
> >>>> post
> >>>>>> command.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech
> >>>>>> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url
> >>>> parameter.
> >>>>>> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c
> >>>> parameter,
> >>>>>> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <
> gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most
> sense
> >>>>>>> there.  Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got
> >> thoughts!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients?
> >>>>>>>> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the
> >> binary
> >>>>>>>> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them
> "internal"
> >>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only
> dog-fooding?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jan
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <
> >> gerlowsk...@gmail.com
> >>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new
> >>>> Python
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> Javascript clients in front of users.  I'm willing to RM the
> >> release,
> >>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>> share duties with you if you're interested David?  Publishing the
> >> new
> >>>>>>>>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd
> >>>> hate
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely
> to
> >>>>>> crop
> >>>>>>>> up.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish
> timeframe?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in
> the
> >>>> way
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> that either.  Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1
> >> even
> >>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>> a 9.5.  I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a
> >>>> willing
> >>>>>>>> RM
> >>>>>>>>> for 9.4.1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl <
> jan....@cominvent.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that
> unknown
> >>>>>>>>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much
> >>>> easier
> >>>>>>>>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users.
> >>>>>>>>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is
> always
> >>>>>> room
> >>>>>>>>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features,
> we
> >>>>>> don't
> >>>>>>>>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in
> >> my
> >>>>>>>> mind it
> >>>>>>>>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2
> >>>>>> months
> >>>>>>>> has
> >>>>>>>>>> passed.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Jan
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley <
> >>>> david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue...
> >>>> but I
> >>>>>>>>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are.
> >>>> But
> >>>>>>>>>> really
> >>>>>>>>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering;
> doing a
> >>>>>> patch
> >>>>>>>>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate
> >> bug.
> >>>>>> It
> >>>>>>>>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just
> >>>>>> helping
> >>>>>>>>>>> someone fix their problem.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on
> >> Solr
> >>>>>>>> 9.5,
> >>>>>>>>>> so
> >>>>>>>>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1.  That Lucene release also touches the
> >> index
> >>>>>>>>>> format
> >>>>>>>>>>> BTW.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ~ David
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey
> >>>>>>>> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option.  If it still is, I
> would
> >>>>>>>> prefer
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> do 9.5.  What do people think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that
> >> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that
> >> the
> >>>>>>>> author
> >>>>>>>>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that
> >>>> gets
> >>>>>>>> its
> >>>>>>>>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently.  It hasn't
> given
> >>>> me
> >>>>>>>> any
> >>>>>>>>>>>> trouble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I say go for it.  Someday I will do a release myself.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Shawn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________
> >>>>>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC |
> >> 434.466.1467 |
> >>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> >>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> >>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> >>>>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered
> to
> >> be
> >>>>>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
> of
> >>>>>> whether attachments are marked as such.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

-- 
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)

Reply via email to