WRT the possibility of 9.5 I think the deadlock in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17060 should be a blocker for 9.5. If others agree we can mark it for that...
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:55 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on track > again. Normally it only files new PRs on Sundays, but I'm triggering that > manually now to consider what other upgrades from the past month that we > should put into 9.4.1. > > Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/solr/pulls/solrbot and > consider which ones should be merged and backported. > > Jan > > > 8. des. 2023 kl. 14:59 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: > > > > I renamed that job to add "(Crave)" > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x%20(Crave)/ and > > disabled it. I then I created a new job copied from the > "Solr-check-main" > > but branch_9x. Builds are hourly so we'll see how it goes. > > > > ~ David > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > wrote: > > > >> PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is also > not > >> running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave.. > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>> I've been working with Uv on these glitches. > >>> ~ David > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number of > >>>> known CVEs down. > >>>> > >>>> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but > >>>> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests: > >>>> > >>>>> Run cd > >>>> > >> > /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr > >>>>> Selecting project Solr (id:39) > >>>>> Error: Process completed with exit code 1. > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>>> > >>>>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com > >: > >>>>> > >>>>> Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will happen > >> as > >>>>> there are a couple security matters we're looking at. > >>>>> ~ David > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh < > >>>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the > bin/solr > >>>> post > >>>>>> command. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech > >>>>>> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url > >>>> parameter. > >>>>>> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c > >>>> parameter, > >>>>>> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski < > gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most > sense > >>>>>>> there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got > >> thoughts! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients? > >>>>>>>> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the > >> binary > >>>>>>>> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them > "internal" > >>>>>> only > >>>>>>>> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only > dog-fooding? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Jan > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski < > >> gerlowsk...@gmail.com > >>>>> : > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new > >>>> Python > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the > >> release, > >>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing the > >> new > >>>>>>>>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd > >>>> hate > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely > to > >>>>>> crop > >>>>>>>> up. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish > timeframe? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in > the > >>>> way > >>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1 > >> even > >>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a > >>>> willing > >>>>>>>> RM > >>>>>>>>> for 9.4.1 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl < > jan....@cominvent.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that > unknown > >>>>>>>>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much > >>>> easier > >>>>>>>>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users. > >>>>>>>>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is > always > >>>>>> room > >>>>>>>>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features, > we > >>>>>> don't > >>>>>>>>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in > >> my > >>>>>>>> mind it > >>>>>>>>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2 > >>>>>> months > >>>>>>>> has > >>>>>>>>>> passed. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Jan > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley < > >>>> david.w.smi...@gmail.com > >>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue... > >>>> but I > >>>>>>>>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are. > >>>> But > >>>>>>>>>> really > >>>>>>>>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; > doing a > >>>>>> patch > >>>>>>>>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate > >> bug. > >>>>>> It > >>>>>>>>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just > >>>>>> helping > >>>>>>>>>>> someone fix their problem. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on > >> Solr > >>>>>>>> 9.5, > >>>>>>>>>> so > >>>>>>>>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches the > >> index > >>>>>>>>>> format > >>>>>>>>>>> BTW. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ~ David > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey > >>>>>>>> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I > would > >>>>>>>> prefer > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that > >> for > >>>>>>>>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that > >> the > >>>>>>>> author > >>>>>>>>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that > >>>> gets > >>>>>>>> its > >>>>>>>>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't > given > >>>> me > >>>>>>>> any > >>>>>>>>>>>> trouble. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Shawn > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________ > >>>>>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | > >> 434.466.1467 | > >>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > >>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > >>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > >>>>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered > to > >> be > >>>>>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless > of > >>>>>> whether attachments are marked as such. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
