SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on track again. Normally it only files new PRs on Sundays, but I'm triggering that manually now to consider what other upgrades from the past month that we should put into 9.4.1.
Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/solr/pulls/solrbot and consider which ones should be merged and backported. Jan > 8. des. 2023 kl. 14:59 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: > > I renamed that job to add "(Crave)" > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x%20(Crave)/ and > disabled it. I then I created a new job copied from the "Solr-check-main" > but branch_9x. Builds are hourly so we'll see how it goes. > > ~ David > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > >> PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is also not >> running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave.. >> >> Jan >> >>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> I've been working with Uv on these glitches. >>> ~ David >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number of >>>> known CVEs down. >>>> >>>> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but >>>> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests: >>>> >>>>> Run cd >>>> >> /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr >>>>> Selecting project Solr (id:39) >>>>> Error: Process completed with exit code 1. >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>> Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will happen >> as >>>>> there are a couple security matters we're looking at. >>>>> ~ David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh < >>>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the bin/solr >>>> post >>>>>> command. >>>>>> >>>>>> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech >>>>>> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url >>>> parameter. >>>>>> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c >>>> parameter, >>>>>> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date. >>>>>> >>>>>> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most sense >>>>>>> there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got >> thoughts! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients? >>>>>>>> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the >> binary >>>>>>>> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them "internal" >>>>>> only >>>>>>>> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only dog-fooding? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski < >> gerlowsk...@gmail.com >>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new >>>> Python >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the >> release, >>>>>> or >>>>>>>>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing the >> new >>>>>>>>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd >>>> hate >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely to >>>>>> crop >>>>>>>> up. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish timeframe? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in the >>>> way >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1 >> even >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a >>>> willing >>>>>>>> RM >>>>>>>>> for 9.4.1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that unknown >>>>>>>>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much >>>> easier >>>>>>>>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users. >>>>>>>>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is always >>>>>> room >>>>>>>>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features, we >>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in >> my >>>>>>>> mind it >>>>>>>>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2 >>>>>> months >>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>> passed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley < >>>> david.w.smi...@gmail.com >>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue... >>>> but I >>>>>>>>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are. >>>> But >>>>>>>>>> really >>>>>>>>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a >>>>>> patch >>>>>>>>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate >> bug. >>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just >>>>>> helping >>>>>>>>>>> someone fix their problem. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on >> Solr >>>>>>>> 9.5, >>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches the >> index >>>>>>>>>> format >>>>>>>>>>> BTW. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ~ David >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey >>>>>>>> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would >>>>>>>> prefer >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that >> for >>>>>>>>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that >> the >>>>>>>> author >>>>>>>>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that >>>> gets >>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't given >>>> me >>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>> trouble. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Shawn >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________ >>>>>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | >> 434.466.1467 | >>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com < >>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < >>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> >>>>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < >>>>>> >>>> >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to >> be >>>>>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of >>>>>> whether attachments are marked as such. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>> >>>> >> >>
