Hi David, I think we should include SOLR-17112 as well. On some systems, the bin/solr script doesn't work properly. Regards, Ishan
On Sun, 7 Jan, 2024, 11:33 am David Smiley, <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > Sure; thanks. > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:29 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > > > Should we include this bugfix? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16203 > > I'm merging to branch_9x now... > > > > Jan > > > > > 5. jan. 2024 kl. 17:14 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>: > > > > > > 9.4.1 is unblocked; bug fixes are now on the release branch. I plan to > > > pursue a RC soon (today/tomorrow). This is my first time. > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:53 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on > > track > > >> again. Normally it only files new PRs on Sundays, but I'm triggering > > that > > >> manually now to consider what other upgrades from the past month that > we > > >> should put into 9.4.1. > > >> > > >> Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/solr/pulls/solrbot > and > > >> consider which ones should be merged and backported. > > >> > > >> Jan > > >> > > >>> 8. des. 2023 kl. 14:59 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com > >: > > >>> > > >>> I renamed that job to add "(Crave)" > > >>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x%20(Crave)/ > > and > > >>> disabled it. I then I created a new job copied from the > > >> "Solr-check-main" > > >>> but branch_9x. Builds are hourly so we'll see how it goes. > > >>> > > >>> ~ David > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is > also > > >> not > > >>>> running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave.. > > >>>> > > >>>> Jan > > >>>> > > >>>>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley < > david.w.smi...@gmail.com > > >: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I've been working with Uv on these glitches. > > >>>>> ~ David > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the > number > > of > > >>>>>> known CVEs down. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but > > >>>>>> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Run cd > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr > > >>>>>>> Selecting project Solr (id:39) > > >>>>>>> Error: Process completed with exit code 1. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Jan > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley < > > david.w.smi...@gmail.com > > >>> : > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will > > happen > > >>>> as > > >>>>>>> there are a couple security matters we're looking at. > > >>>>>>> ~ David > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh < > > >>>>>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the > > >> bin/solr > > >>>>>> post > > >>>>>>>> command. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c > > tech > > >>>>>>>> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url > > >>>>>> parameter. > > >>>>>>>> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c > > >>>>>> parameter, > > >>>>>>>> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski < > > >> gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most > > >> sense > > >>>>>>>>> there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got > > >>>> thoughts! > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl < > > jan....@cominvent.com> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients? > > >>>>>>>>>> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in > the > > >>>> binary > > >>>>>>>>>> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them > > >> "internal" > > >>>>>>>> only > > >>>>>>>>>> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only > > >> dog-fooding? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jan > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski < > > >>>> gerlowsk...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our > new > > >>>>>> Python > > >>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the > > >>>> release, > > >>>>>>>> or > > >>>>>>>>>>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing > > the > > >>>> new > > >>>>>>>>>>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and > > I'd > > >>>>>> hate > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are > > likely > > >> to > > >>>>>>>> crop > > >>>>>>>>>> up. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish > > >> timeframe? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get > in > > >> the > > >>>>>> way > > >>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a > > 9.4.1 > > >>>> even > > >>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether > there's a > > >>>>>> willing > > >>>>>>>>>> RM > > >>>>>>>>>>> for 9.4.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl < > > >> jan....@cominvent.com> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that > > >> unknown > > >>>>>>>>>>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a > > much > > >>>>>> easier > > >>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is > > >> always > > >>>>>>>> room > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer > features, > > >> we > > >>>>>>>> don't > > >>>>>>>>>>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to > release, > > in > > >>>> my > > >>>>>>>>>> mind it > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or > that > > >2 > > >>>>>>>> months > > >>>>>>>>>> has > > >>>>>>>>>>>> passed. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jan > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley < > > >>>>>> david.w.smi...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one > > issue... > > >>>>>> but I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we > > are. > > >>>>>> But > > >>>>>>>>>>>> really > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; > > >> doing a > > >>>>>>>> patch > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an > unfortunate > > >>>> bug. > > >>>>>>>> It > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was > > just > > >>>>>>>> helping > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> someone fix their problem. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit > > on > > >>>> Solr > > >>>>>>>>>> 9.5, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> so > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches > the > > >>>> index > > >>>>>>>>>>>> format > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ~ David > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey > > >>>>>>>>>> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I > > >> would > > >>>>>>>>>> prefer > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as > > that > > >>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something > > that > > >>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>> author > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install > > that > > >>>>>> gets > > >>>>>>>>>> its > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't > > >> given > > >>>>>> me > > >>>>>>>>>> any > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> trouble. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shawn > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> _______________________ > > >>>>>>>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | > > >>>> 434.466.1467 | > > >>>>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > > >>>>>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > > >>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > > >>>>>>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is > considered > > >> to > > >>>> be > > >>>>>>>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, > > regardless > > >> of > > >>>>>>>> whether attachments are marked as such. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > >
