PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is also not
running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave..
Jan
> 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
>
> I've been working with Uv on these glitches.
> ~ David
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
>> I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number of
>> known CVEs down.
>>
>> I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but
>> unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests:
>>
>>> Run cd
>> /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr
>>> Selecting project Solr (id:39)
>>> Error: Process completed with exit code 1.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>> 7. des. 2023 kl. 02:44 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will happen as
>>> there are a couple security matters we're looking at.
>>> ~ David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh <
>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the bin/solr
>> post
>>>> command.
>>>>
>>>> Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech
>>>> products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url
>> parameter.
>>>> I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c
>> parameter,
>>>> and then make sure the Ref Guide is up to date.
>>>>
>>>> This could be a 9.4.1 or 9.5 change.
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 6, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most sense
>>>>> there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got thoughts!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients?
>>>>>> I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the binary
>>>>>> tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them "internal"
>>>> only
>>>>>> for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only dog-fooding?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38 skrev Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com
>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new
>> Python
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the release,
>>>> or
>>>>>>> share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing the new
>>>>>>> clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd
>> hate
>>>> to
>>>>>>> saddle someone else with ironing out whatever hiccups are likely to
>>>> crop
>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you guys think about doing 9.5 on a January-ish timeframe?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That said, if someone else wants a 9.4.1 I don't want to get in the
>> way
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> that either. Jan's right that there'd still be value in a 9.4.1 even
>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> a 9.5. I imagine the driving factor would be whether there's a
>> willing
>>>>>> RM
>>>>>>> for 9.4.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:42 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that unknown
>>>>>>>> regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much
>> easier
>>>>>>>> upgrade path for 9.4.0 users.
>>>>>>>> However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is always
>>>> room
>>>>>>>> for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer features, we
>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> need to wait for a certain number of new features to release, in my
>>>>>> mind it
>>>>>>>> is enought that we have one very interesting feature, or that >2
>>>> months
>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can help backport dependency upgrades.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 6. des. 2023 kl. 05:50 skrev David Smiley <
>> david.w.smi...@gmail.com
>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue...
>> but I
>>>>>>>>> didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are.
>> But
>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>> I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a
>>>> patch
>>>>>>>>> release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate bug.
>>>> It
>>>>>>>>> wasn't even a feature I was using in my day-to-day; I was just
>>>> helping
>>>>>>>>> someone fix their problem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW a new Lucene release is close so we might to wait a bit on Solr
>>>>>> 9.5,
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>> maybe we do this 9.4.1. That Lucene release also touches the index
>>>>>>>> format
>>>>>>>>> BTW.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ~ David
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:50 PM Shawn Heisey
>>>>>> <apa...@elyograg.org.invalid
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would
>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> do 9.5. What do people think?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that for
>>>>>>>>>> 9.4.0, but it's not small either.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I do not know whether any of those changes are something that the
>>>>>> author
>>>>>>>>>> thinks needs to bake for a little while longer.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I run a branch_9x snapshot on my little tiny Solr install that
>> gets
>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>> index from dovecot, and I update it frequently. It hasn't given
>> me
>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>> trouble.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I say go for it. Someday I will do a release myself.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Shawn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________
>>>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
>>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
>>>>
>> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
>>>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
>>>> whether attachments are marked as such.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>>
>>
