We've seen a lot of new graphs come out that don't do TinkerPop from the start. Perhaps they make a conscious decision not to - i dunno. I just wonder if part of the problem is the provider docs for doing an implementation:
http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.0-incubating/dev/provider/ are they easy enough to find? do folks understand them and what it means to be tinkerpop-enabled? the docs could probably be improved - any graph providers out there want to take a stab at it? in some ways your external experience at implementing might be helpful in improving them. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > See https://github.com/haifengl/unicorn > > They say they support a "Gremlin-like API." It would be really cool if > they just implemented TinkerPop's Graph API. Perhaps someone feels like > creating a ticket at their main repo explaining how to go about supporting > TinkerPop? Or, even better, providing them a PR! > > https://github.com/adplabs/unicorn > > Take care, > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > >
