Hi guys, I don't think any feature (R or whatever) should be prerequisites of graduation. Especially when a project never setup those features as a graduation goal.
Including specific features could be valid concern for release discussion, but i don't think it's related to a graduation. Graduation is much more like if project is doing it in apache way, in my understanding. Last time the reason why i didn't go for a graduation vote is, because of there were valid concern about contribution impasse. Since that, community improved / clarified contribution guide and review process. And Zeppelin PPMC members were trying to help many contributions that they have been as a open PR for a long time. (Especially Jongyoul and Felix helped a lot) So, let's move discussions like 'which feature should be included' to the release / roadmap discussion. In the graduation discussion, i'd like to have an discussions, such as evaluating http://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html, etc. Does this make sense for you guys? Amos, Eran, Sourav? Thanks, moon On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:05 AM Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com> wrote: > No Eran is right. The last vote for graduation passed-it was not withdrawn > in favor of releasing 0.5.6. It passed and there was some feedback from the > mentors concerning graduation, R, and some other issues. And that's the > last public discussion about graduation until today. > > Alex if you disagree with that do you have links to the discussion emails > that you're referring to. > > > On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Eran, > > > > thanks for sharing your oppinion! > > > > Could you please check my previous reply about release schedulle and let > us > > know if that makes sense to you? > > > > By the way, please our mentors correct me if I'm wrong here, but after > > reading [1] I was under impression that project does not have pre-request > > regarding its code or features in order to undergo this formal procedure > of > > graduation. > > > > [1] > > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator > > > >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016, 20:04 Eran Witkon <eranwit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> If I recall correctly R support was one of the pre-requisite for > graduation > >> from day one. > >> I agree that Authentication should be added as well. > >> +1 for graduation after we add both > >> Eran > >> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 20:24 Sourav Mazumder < > sourav.mazumde...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Surely I vote for the same. Zeppelin is already very popular in > different > >>> quarts of the Spark/Big Data user group. High time to graduate it to > top > >>> level. > >>> > >>> However, I shall suggest to have the support for R and Authentication > >> added > >>> to Zeppelin before that. These are the supports most of the people are > >>> eagerly waiting for. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Sourav > >>> > >>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:23 AM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Thanks Alexander for resuming the discussion. > >>>> Let's start a vote. > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> moon > >>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:11 PM Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Dear Zeppelin developers, > >>>>> > >>>>> now, after number of releases and committers grew more I'd like to > >>>> suggest > >>>>> the re-new the discussion of graduating Zeppelin to top level > >> project. > >>>>> > >>>>> If there are on objections - next step would be to start a VOTE > >> thread > >>>>> here. > >>>>> > >>>>> What do you guys think? > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Alex > >> >
