Hi Jeff, You can find the list of PPMC here [1], although it doesn't include the affiliations. We do not currently have commiters only status in the project.
Informations about how to become a Committer is inside the Contributing document of the project [2] For the selection, we follow the usual Apache Process: * Discussion on inviting a new member is created on the @private mailing list (any PPMC can create a discussion) * PPMCs are voting on that thread * If the vote is a success, an invite will be sent to that person, and the result is published on the mailing list if the invite is accepted. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/zeppelin.html [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#becoming-a-committer On Feb 16, 2016 4:42 PM, "Jeff Steinmetz" <jeffrey.steinm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mainly for clarity (as I may have missed such a summary) - > Is there a summary that exists (or perhaps we could reply here) that > outlines: > > What's the process within the zeppelin project to add additional > Committers and/or PMC members? > Who selects the people for these roles, and is there diversity beyond one > affiliation/company in terms of who is selecting additional committers or > PMC members? > Who are all the current PMC members and affiliations? > Who are all the committers and affiliations? > How would we know if you desire more members? > > I found this: > http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator > Although - it's one large list with several incubator projects vs > zeppelin alone. > > Best, > Jeff Steinmetz > Principal Architect > Akili Interactive Labs > > > > > > On 2/11/16, 9:31 PM, "moon soo Lee" <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > >Correction > > > >from > > > >And programmer is a requirement of (P)PMC [1]. > > > >to > > > >And programmer is not a requirement of (P)PMC [1]. > > > >Thanks, > >moon > > > >On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:30 PM moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Appreciate Amos, for sharing thoughtful concerns. > >> > >> If i add more answer, > >> > >> So far, Zeppelin has 8 PPMC from 4 different affiliations. And 5 of them > >> is work in the same company. 3 of them from 3 different affiliation > invited > >> since it's incubation. > >> > >> I personally think all 3 are good programmer, but it may depends on how > >> you define 'programmer'. And programmer is a requirement of (P)PMC [1]. > >> > >> In point of view of survival, Zeppelin will still have at least 3 > >> different PPMC from 3 different affiliation, in the case of all PPMC > >> disappearing from any particular affiliation. Project still able to make > >> any decisions. > >> > >> Diversity of PPMC affiliation is not a requirement of graduation > according > >> to this thread [2] (I guess this is the email that Roman mention). > >> > >> I think meaning of 'diversity' is not limited to affiliation. > 'Diversity' > >> can be location, language, nationality, gender, background, experience, > and > >> so on. In this perspective, I think Zeppelin PPMC are quite diverse. > >> > >> One person could have more commits than others. > >> But that doesn't give more votes because of that. All people has the > same > >> single vote, that's effective particularly making decision in Apache > way. > >> > >> > >> Regarding diversity of view points, > >> > >> To me, I always see different opinions, ideas on comment of PR/issue > (most > >> discussions are happening on PR/issue) whether they're strong or not, > and > >> most of them, eventually converged. I'd like to see it 'mature' than 'no > >> disagreement'. > >> > >> And many different of features and improvements has been discussed and > >> contributed from various people/organizations, most of them actually > not on > >> the roadmap. Thats another form of diversity I can see from Zeppelin > >> community. > >> > >> Although no one blocks post email or leave comment on any discussion, If > >> we feel we need more diversity of view point, we can always improve it > by > >> explicitly encourage participating discussion from Zeppelin's > contribution > >> guide, or by any other way. > >> > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc > >> [2] http://markmail.org/message/5l5hsygvntcx5fqb > >> < > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201507.mbox/%3c20150721204853.gg28...@boudnik.org%3E > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> moon > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:56 AM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Amos Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > The one that is a graduation issue, concerns the diversity of the > PMC, > >>> and > >>> > whether graduation is being rushed. The project still is largely > >>> centered > >>> > around one individual and company. > >>> > >>> FWIW: the diversity requirements around company affiliation have been, > >>> if not de-emphasized, but made at least less of a concern in the past > few > >>> years. Search for emails from Roy Fielding on that subject. > >>> > >>> Another concern that you are raising -- the lack of diversity of view > >>> points > >>> is quite real in my opinion. > >>> > >>> > As another example, I don't think we ever discussed what to do about > >>> having > >>> > fallen behind the roadmap. Instead of looking at how to get to meet > our > >>> > standard, we adjusted the standard. > >>> > >>> That is, also, strictly speaking not a problem. Interest in projects > >>> waxes and wanes > >>> all the time. ASF is not a commercial entity -- we're a bunch of > >>> volunteers and > >>> lulls are to be excepted. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Roman. > >>> > >> > >
