On Friday 08 February 2002 05:04 pm, you wrote:
> On Friday, February 08, 2002, w9ya wrote:
> > > > Now, perhaps we can take this a step further. Many other distros are
> > > > being used for firewalling, including firewall centered distros
> > > > (clarkconnect among
> > > > others), that successfully use the 2.4 kernel. There are plenty
> > > > of examples
> > > > of distros that have moved early and successfully to the these
> > > > newer kernels,
> > > > including manged server distros.
> > >
> > > The step further (to do it right) would be to help develop/port the
> > > necessary masq modules to the 2.4.x kernel.  This seems to be the key
> > > to get Mitel to move the SME server to the 2.4.x kernel.
> >
> > The point is, many distros have migrated from 2.2 to 2.4 and have this
> > functionality. I consider many of these to have done it right.
> > Other distros
> > have created answers to their unique or not so unique challenges
> > with this
> > not so 2.4.x kernel series. I am now asking when e-smith/Mitel plans to.
>
> Could you be a little more specific here?  Perhaps you could share with us
> specifically which other distros have this functionality, so we could try
> to track down how they accomplished it and look for info as to how we can
> incorporate that into the SME server and gateway.  I know that several
> people here would be willing to look, given a place.

I think the confusion is based on trying to both firewall and serve? At least 
it is for me. I seem to remember when e-smith recommended that firewalling 
and serving should be done separately, on separate equipment. I tend to agree 
with that.

Bob

>
> David M. Brown
> Frick, Frick & Jetté Architects
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org

Reply via email to