On Wednesday 07 Mar 2012 17:55:57 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Nicolas Hernandez schrieb: > > Hello Ian, > > > > We are still looking for the best choice between running in jetty > > a. Accessibility for devs (nice eclipse plugin for example) > > b. Accessibility for user > > c. Light weight > > d. Performance > > > > In our side the priority are like that a>b>d>c (+eclipse plugin) > > Four some freenet devs it loks like c>d>a>b (+velocity for templating) > > > > Not so easy to make the good choice. We have three mains ideas > > A- using Apache Wickets http://wicket.apache.org/ > > B- gwt > > I dont contribute code as a freenet dev, but i do package it for Gentoo > linux and from that perspective, i have to strongly vote against gwt. > That thing is a big beast with many included external libs, often even > modified ones and a complex build system. I once tried to create a > package for it, it took me many hours and there was still no good > result. So unless this has greatly increased or someone else can provide > a sane package for Gentoo, requiring this framework to build freenet > would result in freenet being dropped from Gentoo as a package.
Generally we don't WANT packages, because they get frozen in time for years. But gentoo is an exception. Also, there is a package for GWT for Debian, I wonder if somebody has done one for Gentoo? A lot of stuff uses GWT ... However I am skeptical about GWT because of the javascript vs non-javascript issue. Maybe that's less now but there was a very strong party on FMS etc for providing a non-JS option last time we discussed it.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
