Thomas Bruderer wrote:
> I want to mention at least something: If we have a small world topology we 
> have
> many links to nearby nodes, and we have a few long links. The long links will
> probably have more traffic then the nearby links. If such long links would be
> between nodes with more capacity this would also help the rest of the network.

For what it's worth, I did some quick-and-dirty simulations a while back
to test this theory - like you I thought longer links would have higher
load, but it turns out the opposite is true. However my sims didn't
include caching - if nearby nodes have similar items in their caches,
that might relieve some of the load on short links.

Cheers,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: load.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7896 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070602/c88997e6/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Node.java
Type: text/x-java
Size: 1879 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070602/c88997e6/attachment.java>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SimpleRoutingTest.java
Type: text/x-java
Size: 1459 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070602/c88997e6/attachment-0001.java>

Reply via email to