On 31/10/15 21:18, Bert Massop wrote: > On 31-10-15 17:27, Bob Ham wrote: >> On Sat, 2015-10-14 at 20:22 +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: >>> I think it's time for us all to take a step back and have a serious >>> conversation about where we are, and where we are going. >> I (as pintu) asked this question on IRC a little while back, I think >> it's worth sharing that log. Here is an executive summary: >> >> [omitted outdated chat log of anonymous user wasting developer time] > I've read your chat log and learned exactly nothing new about where we > are and where we are going. Nor did I learn how documenting a protocol, > what you seem to be advocating endlessly, would help just the slightest > bit in getting there. > > Mind you, most Freenet developers are volunteers who all share a common > goal of making Freenet work better — be it by contributing changes to > the core for making the network faster and more secure, by adding > features providing for new use cases, or by improving the overall user > experience. > > If you share the same goal, you could be one of them. Please feel > invited to contribute by submitting pull requests for the patches you > write, or if you are unable to code, by filing clear and concise bug > reports for parts of Freenet that don't work well yet. Feel free to document the protocol too! We definitely need more documentation.
Just don't demand that we freeze it just to keep the docs up to date. It is not yet at a point where we could declare it stable; there are major problems that still need fixing at the protocol level.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
