On Tuesday 22 May 2007 01:15, jarvil at gmail.com wrote: > > Well do we really want nodes to be sending 99% of their traffic to a > > single ubernode? That doesn't seem healthy to me. Potential attacks. > > Since the links of this nature would be entirely random there is no > such thing as an "ubernode". The structure of freenet is such that > there is no way to map topology as you have said.
I mean on the level of an individual node. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070522/d5964818/attachment.pgp>
