On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau < [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for Classic > Classic sounds good. +1 > > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres <[email protected]>: > > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons : > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we > might > > have more than one > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me > > It has a distinguishable name > > > > I find "xwiki flavour" confusing ( it implies that other flavors are > > non-xwiki ones...) > > > > Olivier Sérès > > > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > > > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > > >>> Hi devs, > > >>> > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE. > > >>> > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed > > XWiki now. > > >>> > > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not > tied > > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor" > > >>> :)). > > >>> > > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails: > > >>> * "XWiki Flavor" > > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor" > > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor" > > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor" > > >> > > >> A few more ideas: > > >> > > >> * Classic > > >> * Raw > > >> * Starter > > > > > > Not a fan or "Raw". > > > > > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most users. > > > Not sure about "Starter". > > > > > >> > > >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term. > > >>> > > >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor. > > >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's > > >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed > > >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me. > > >>> > > >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not going > > >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually > see > > >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than > > >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since the > > >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm > also > > >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name. > > >>> > > >>> WDYT ? > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Sergiu Dumitriu > > >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thomas Mortagne > > > > > > -- > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS > Committer on the XWiki.org project >
