No there is no default UI in this distribution, just flavors. As I said in the previous mail you will have a flavor picker in which you will see the classic one and the others.
Of course other distributions of XWiki may still have default UI and don't let you choose a flavor like XE does. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote: > When you download the war, you have no UI. At that point, I guess you will > be proposed to install the default UI associated to your war (which, in > this case, will be one and the same with the "Standard XWiki Flavor") OR > choose from a list of available Flavors. In this case, I guess that > "Standard XWiki Flavor" will not be listed in the flavors list, to avoid > duplication. > > If I got things right, then it sounds good to me to see the first option > (i.e. featured) to be the "standard" and, below it, various alternatives > for various/specialized use cases. > > Thanks, > Eduard > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in previous >> > discussions. >> > >> >> > It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start customizing >> > or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard". >> >> Note exactly. When you download XWiki you don't have any Flavor >> installed, you choose the classic/standard one among several others >> (ok maybe not several right now :)), it's just the first one listed. >> >> > >> > That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a packaging >> (for >> > the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in it`s >> > name. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Eduard >> > >> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau < >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > +1 for Classic >> >> > >> >> >> >> Classic sounds good. +1 >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres <[email protected]>: >> >> > >> >> > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons : >> >> > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we >> >> > might >> >> > > have more than one >> >> > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me >> >> > > It has a distinguishable name >> >> > > >> >> > > I find "xwiki flavour" confusing ( it implies that other flavors >> are >> >> > > non-xwiki ones...) >> >> > > >> >> > > Olivier Sérès >> >> > > >> >> > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne < >> [email protected]> >> >> a >> >> > > écrit : >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu < >> [email protected]> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> >> > > >>> Hi devs, >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new >> platform >> >> > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE. >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when >> >> installed >> >> > > XWiki now. >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, >> not >> >> > tied >> >> > > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base >> Flavor" >> >> > > >>> :)). >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails: >> >> > > >>> * "XWiki Flavor" >> >> > > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor" >> >> > > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor" >> >> > > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor" >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> A few more ideas: >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> * Classic >> >> > > >> * Raw >> >> > > >> * Starter >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Not a fan or "Raw". >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most >> users. >> >> > > > Not sure about "Starter". >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term. >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base >> flavor. >> >> > > >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course >> it's >> >> > > >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre >> installed >> >> > > >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me. >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not >> >> going >> >> > > >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you >> actually >> >> > see >> >> > > >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than >> >> > > >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing >> since >> >> the >> >> > > >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. >> I'm >> >> > also >> >> > > >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better >> name. >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> WDYT ? >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> -- >> >> > > >> Sergiu Dumitriu >> >> > > >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > -- >> >> > > > Thomas Mortagne >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) >> >> > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >> >> > Committer on the XWiki.org project >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Mortagne >> -- Thomas Mortagne
