On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in previous > discussions. >
> It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start customizing > or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard". Note exactly. When you download XWiki you don't have any Flavor installed, you choose the classic/standard one among several others (ok maybe not several right now :)), it's just the first one listed. > > That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a packaging (for > the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in it`s > name. > > Thanks, > Eduard > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > +1 for Classic >> > >> >> Classic sounds good. +1 >> >> >> > >> > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons : >> > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we >> > might >> > > have more than one >> > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me >> > > It has a distinguishable name >> > > >> > > I find "xwiki flavour" confusing ( it implies that other flavors are >> > > non-xwiki ones...) >> > > >> > > Olivier Sérès >> > > >> > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> >> a >> > > écrit : >> > > > >> > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> > > >>> Hi devs, >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform >> > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when >> installed >> > > XWiki now. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not >> > tied >> > > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor" >> > > >>> :)). >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails: >> > > >>> * "XWiki Flavor" >> > > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor" >> > > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor" >> > > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor" >> > > >> >> > > >> A few more ideas: >> > > >> >> > > >> * Classic >> > > >> * Raw >> > > >> * Starter >> > > > >> > > > Not a fan or "Raw". >> > > > >> > > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most users. >> > > > Not sure about "Starter". >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor. >> > > >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's >> > > >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed >> > > >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not >> going >> > > >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually >> > see >> > > >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than >> > > >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since >> the >> > > >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm >> > also >> > > >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> WDYT ? >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> -- >> > > >> Sergiu Dumitriu >> > > >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Thomas Mortagne >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) >> > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >> > Committer on the XWiki.org project >> > >> -- Thomas Mortagne
