Yea, i thought about that long time. Also regarding Justins suggestion: Justin Carter wrote: > > In an ideal world it would actually be nice to achieve with just a > class name on the unordered list, but I know that might be taking it a > bit too far :) >
At the end, i decided not to handle "layout" issues with jCarousel. Think about a situation where someone don't wants to have buttons. For example he wants to just let autoscroll the carousel without wanting interactions by the user. Jan Dan Atkinson wrote: > > Sorry. My mistake. > > I meant removing the left and right button handlers > (prevButtonStateHandler, nextButtonStateHandler). > > If I remove these in jCarousel, the left and right buttons are no longer > visible, and I have no way of moving between images manually without > adding in the handlers. > > It would be great for the default package to contain both sets of images > (prev/next & enabled/disabled), and then the image links could be > overridden if the user so chose. > > I'd try an explain in Deutsche, but it's much worse than your English! ;) > > Cheers, > > Dan > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jCarousel-tf2205628.html#a6135379 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
