>I gave up on MusicIP a while back for a few reasonsÂ… one, because it
>always seemed to cause weirdness in my music library, like  albums
>listed twice with songs split between the two listings and rescans took
>forever.
>
That sounds very fixable.

I didn't like the way that the MusicIP plugin messed with the content of my SC 
library, so I changed the plugin.  With my patch, it's possible to configure it 
so that it only uses MIP to determine if a track is mixable; i.e. it won't then 
read the MIP library tags at all.  This also radically improved the SC library 
scan time (especially scans for new files).

>Another reason is that I have a lot of music in my library that
>I don't care to hear in mixes.
>
I can immediately think of solutions for that:
1) configure an MIP filter to eg. not play music in a certain genre, by a 
certain artist, less than a certain duration, etc.  Then configure the plugin 
to only make mixes based on that filter.
2) use CustomSkip to skip songs in SC that don't meet your requirements.

>MIP can filter by ratings, but it can't
>read ratings from tags. So when I used MusicIP before, it was a pain
>always trying to keep ratings in sync with my files and MIP. 
>
I find that the MIP libarary is automatically fed ratings set from SC (via 
TrackStat).  I must admit that I don't know how this happens (is this via 
MusicIP plugin or TrackStat or CustomScan?).

The first time I used CustomScan to export ratings to MusicIP.  This took a 
little while to copy stats across, but since then whenever I set a rating in SC 
(or play a track), the stats are synced across automatically to MIP too.

>Have there been any new developments that would enable what I want to
>do, which is only have MIP use songs that have a 3 or higher rating?
Yes.  In MIP, set a filter to match songs where rating is greater than 2.  In 
SC, create a mix based on that filter.
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to