radish;445833 Wrote: > I disagree with that last bit - I can't see why you need dual core for > SC in any circumstance, in fact seeing as most of SC is single threaded > (apart from things like transcoding) a faster-clocked single core would > be better. As it is, I run on the slowest CPU AMD make and it's just > fine for everything I throw at it.
The idea of a dual core being beneficial is so that 1 core is used for the OS + any other started tasks, and SC can have another core all to itself. I take your point on higher clock speed. -- shake-the-disease Players: Boom, SB1 Server: QNAP TS-239 w/ SSOTS 3.18, SS 7.3.3, MusicIP 1.8, 7k+ tracks (formally running SS 6.3.1 on a QNAP TS-101) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ shake-the-disease's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=698 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=66331 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
