On 8/23/2014 8:28 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Miles Fidelman > <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net <mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>> wrote: > > I did notice the absence of anything related to process. How are we > going to get to a "document (that) captures all known > interoperability issue between DMARC and indirect email flows?" If > this were an RFC, there'd be an author or authors identified, maybe > a draft to start from. > > > Since in essence we're only talking about milestones, I disagree. I've > never seen a set of milestones on a WG charter or otherwise that name > specific people who will complete them.
Assinging names to tasks in a charter? No, certainly not. On the other hand, a common exercise in a wg organizing bof is to look for a show of hands for interesting in specific topics and willingness to work on them. Perhaps an informal query like that, here, would be useful? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
