On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:05 AM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> On 11/9/2020 4:15 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > Invalid or repeated p= tags are a problem, but possibly they don't > > completely disqualify a record. > > > The concept of 'partial' disqualification points to the problem of > trying to be subtle in specifications. > > A specification should provide and demand simple details and simple > handling of problems. > This! > If a domain owner cannot produce a DMARC record that is correct, then it > is far too likely they don't know enough to participate in DMARC. > +1 > Here, the simple rule should be: > > An invalid DMARC record MUST be treated as if no DMARC record is > present. > +100 Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
