On Mon 09/Nov/2020 17:06:02 +0100 Dotzero wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:05 AM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
If a domain owner cannot produce a DMARC record that is correct, then it
is far too likely they don't know enough to participate in DMARC.
+1
Agreed. Possibly, bad DMARC records can be reported to the human point of
contact disclosed in aggregate reports, for domains which generate them.
Here, the simple rule should be:
An invalid DMARC record MUST be treated as if no DMARC record is
present.
+100
+1e2 for me too, even if it disparages bullet 6 of Section 6.6.3.
(Aren't we inflating consensus a little bit this way?)
Yet, it is going to require more wording to make p= mandatory (while sp= is
optional) except for external destination verification records where p= is not
required, than to make all tags optional except v=, at least syntactically.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
