On 11/9/20 4:15 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Sat 07/Nov/2020 10:52:44 +0100 Steven M Jones wrote:
I'm pretty sure both cases would be invalid as DMARC policy records,
in which case they should be ignored.
I don't think so. The current draft says:
[...]
Oops - thank you for the gentle correction about absent "p=" tags in
policy records, Ale.
On 11/9/20 6:05 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 11/9/2020 4:15 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Invalid or repeated p= tags are a problem, but possibly they don't
completely disqualify a record.
The concept of 'partial' disqualification points to the problem of
trying to be subtle in specifications.
A specification should provide and demand simple details and simple
handling of problems.
At least "clear and unambiguous" if we can't quite reach "simple."
[...]
Here, the simple rule should be:
An invalid DMARC record MUST be treated as if no DMARC record is
present.
+1
--S.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
