So where is the proper place to discuss an ongoing IETF experiment? Seems sort of like catch-22.

Mike

On 12/10/20 3:52 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
Michael, Dave, this discussion is off topic.

Please see the Chairs' note here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/HhfoBzu_RlM4aiMbiLc4BaHjjmc/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/HhfoBzu_RlM4aiMbiLc4BaHjjmc/>

There will be a time to discuss indirect mail flow (and if we even care about mailing lists) after the core bis tickets are addressed.

Thank you.

Seth, as Chair

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:45 PM Dave Crocker <dcroc...@gmail.com <mailto:dcroc...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On 12/10/2020 3:34 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
    > I'm just making the observation


    "Basically just declare" is not a linguistic form for 'just making an
    observation'.  It's a proposal.

    d/

-- Dave Crocker
    dcroc...@gmail.com <mailto:dcroc...@gmail.com>
    408.329.0791

    Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
    American Red Cross
    dave.crock...@redcross.org <mailto:dave.crock...@redcross.org>

    _______________________________________________
    dmarc mailing list
    dmarc@ietf.org <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
    <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>



--
*Seth Blank*| VP, Standards and New Technologies
*e:*s...@valimail.com <mailto:s...@valimail.com>
*p:*415.273.8818


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to