On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 6:14 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> On Tue 10/Oct/2023 00:19:56 +0200 Douglas Foster wrote: > > Both approaches have problems. Stop-at-last enables the walk to exit > the > > current organization and stop on a private registry, for both alignment > > evaluation and for aggregate report transmission. This is not a minor > > problem, even if it is arguably infrequent. > > > The illustrative example in the draft says: > > _dmarc.a.b.c.d.e.mail.example.com > _dmarc.e.mail.example.com > _dmarc.mail.example.com > _dmarc.example.com > _dmarc.com > > That is, no stop at all. In this respect, a psd=n at example.com would > save a > lookup. However, it is not something that we can recommend, after we > chose the > obscure tag name. > > I'm not sure I understand what you're saying... The illustrative example cited is intended to illustrate a full tree walk that follows the steps for a full tree walk that are spelled out in the numbered list just prior to the illustrative example. That numbered list includes conditional stops (i.e., if one record is found with the specified condition, stop) in steps 2 and 7. -- *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards & Ecosystem *e:* todd.h...@valimail.com *p:* 703-220-4153 *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
