Matthijs,
On 20/02/2020 09.29, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
On 2/18/20 5:17 PM, Olli Vanhoja wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 16:20 Klaus Malorny <klaus.malo...@knipp.de
<mailto:klaus.malo...@knipp.de>> wrote:
I asked myself about the status of the two drafts. I got the
impression a little
bit that the svcb/httpsvc draft successfully killed the aname draft,
but is now
dying slowly itself. It would be great if somebody could give me
some insight
whether the one or the other has still a measurable heartbeat, to
stay with the
allegories ;-)
SVCB is active almost every day of the week in GitHub.
I can't talk on behalf of the authors of the ANAME draft, but to me it
seems that SVCB is getting more traction and it addresses the core
problems that ANAME was supposed to solve.
ANAME was supposed to solve the CNAME at the apex problem and mitigate
against DNS vendor lock in. Both SVCB and HTTPSSCV do not fix this problem.
But yeah, the draft is pretty much dead due to lack of interest.
Is there a lack of interest? That's not clear to me. I think rather
there are DNS folks who don't like ANAME for philosophical reasons and
actively strive to prevent it moving forward.
Cheers,
--
Shane
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
