> > > I just uploaded a set of binary snapshots built from the CVS head > > > using RedHat's compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.110 package (which produces > > > code compatible with the gcc bundled with the RedHat 7.3 and is > > > the same which was producing the snapshots before). > > > > Unfortunately this appears to be not very helpful for those of us > > who test-run the snapshots on a regular basis against known OpenGL > > programs. This is from the radeon-20020930 binary snapshot: > > > > libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/radeon_dri.so > > libGL error: dlopen failed: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not > > found (required by > > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/radeon_dri.so) > > > > > > _I_ don't have glibc-2.3 on my system and I believe, others don't > > either. So this _might_ render the binary snapshots pretty useless. > But so the 2D driver from that snapshot works for you?
Its c code, so I don't think the version of gcc is that important, what matters is the GLIBC_2.3 symbol, it doesn't show up in the X driver, because it isn't linked against libc, however, the dri portion is. For some bizzare reason, redhat has decided to put a cvs version of glibc in their upcoming distro release, which you are aparently compiling against, the current release version of glibc is 2.2.5, more than 90% of users are probably using this version. *please* find a machine with a copy of glibc2.2, wait until glibc2.3 actually becomes a release to compile against it (or, if in the case of redhat, distribute it with your distro) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: DEDICATED SERVERS only $89! Linux or FreeBSD, FREE setup, FAST network. Get your own server today at http://www.ServePath.com/indexfm.htm _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
