Database quarantine is something I really would like to see.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Kenneth Marshall
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 4:36 PM
> To: Bolla P?ter
> Cc: dspam-dev@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Subject: Re: [dspam-dev] PHP UI alternative to dspamCC
>
> One of the advantages of the current DSPAM quarantine is that
> the ham/spam messages are not delivered to the production
> mail system unless released by the user. Our IMAP system
> keeps any message for 8 days, before it is removed and if
> quarantine messages were stored there, they would end up
> consuming disk resources and backup resources far longer than
> the current setup. I guess that one idea would be to have a
> separate IMAP server for the DSPAM UI.
>
> Regarding the performance of the UI. The activity plots are
> nice, but they parse the entire logfile each time they are
> built. It would be nice to cache just the information for the
> display for historical data to avoid the need to re-read the
> logfile over and over. This would allow us to keep the daily
> activity for a longer period without impacting the display
> update time.
>
> Some ideas.
> Ken
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:29:11AM -0600, Bolla P?ter wrote:
> > Well, in my idea DSPAM would have been converted to use IMAP too,
> > instead of directly manipulating an mbox.
> >
> > Regarding imap server, I would not recommend anythig, as I
> only know
> > cyrus, what I use. But I think that in the majority of dspam setups
> > there is an imap server already in the system somewhere, so
> that would
> > be not much of a performance/maintenance issue. Also I would oppose
> > any server specific solution, IMAP is a quite well followed
> standard,
> > afaik. (So both read and write the mails throug IMAP, without any
> > direct file access. Some IMAP servers don't even let you access the
> > files directly.)
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > Mark Rogers wrote:
> >> Mark Rogers wrote:
> >>> Of-course mbox -> IMAP scripts probably exist, so I could
> still look
> >>> at this option now.
> >> Now that my brain has started...
> >> Of-course I don't need to parse the mbox file and pass the
> mails to
> >> an IMAP server, I just need to convert them to Maildir
> format and let
> >> a normal IMAP server pick them up from there. Which makes
> things far
> >> simpler!
> >> Doh!
> >
>
>
