Azure Lunatic writes:
>On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Joshua Kronengold <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I have no problem with people being able to set their journal
>> default-filtered, aka "you might not know who's reading any given post
>> of mine." But that shouldn't stop people who engage in normal,
>> non-drama laden behavior from doing what they normally want to do --
>> ie, send "entire trust list" posts that are clearly labeled as
>> 'protected broadcast', and filtered posts that are clearly labeled as
>> 'filter'.
>To address this, you'd want a Locked: Undeclared signifier, as well as
>a Locked: All Trusted, and Locked: Subset of Trusted signifier. To
>preserve existing behavior, all locked posts would be imported/set to
>Locked: Undeclared, and someone preferring to show otherwise would
>have to deliberately change the setting. (This could be a journal-wide
>default too.)
Exactly so.
--
Joshua Kronengold (mneme@(io.com, labcats.org)) |\ _,,,--,,_ ,)
--^-- "Did you know, if you increment enough, you /,`.-'`' -, ;-;;'
/\\ get an extra digit?" "I knew," weeps Six. |,4- ) )-,_ ) /\
/-\\\ "We knew. But we had forgotten." '---''(_/--' (_/-'
_______________________________________________
dw-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
