Anthony,
In case you are not aware there is a several sites for biztalk,
www.biztalk.org and www.biztalk.com.  You might
have better luck getting answers from user groups, the one in Seattle is
pretty active for obvious reasons and
I think Microsoft people watch the listserv,  http://seattlebiztalk.org.
Dave Frenkel
----- Original Message -----
From: Beecher, Anthony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: BizTalk for EDI, anyone?


> In my case, BT was forced on me (two consecutive years) for political
> reasons. Each time, I simply "gave it enough rope", and it went away.
>
> If you want to place safe bets, the rule of thumb for Microsoft products
is
> that they
> generally "get it right" by version 3. (This is according to Microsoft)
>
>
> >
> [the Three Choices]
>
>         1) "not to worry"
>         2) "here are the problems, but we've found a way to get around
them"
>         3) "run away as fast as you can".
>
> > I'm hoping the Final Answer lies somewhere between the first 2.
> >
> Heh.  With that kind of EDI strategy by that kind of company, I think the
> Final Answer is 42.     (Douglas Adams, RIP.)
>
> =======================================================================
> To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
>
> =======================================================================
> To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
>

=======================================================================
To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/

Reply via email to