Art, You've made your feelings about turtle.py abundantly clear. I would only suggest that (contrary to your implications) we benighted individuals who actually use the module in teaching and want improve it are also passionate, moral and even (perhaps) intelligent. Or at least we deserve the benefit of the doubt. ;)
However if our discussion of the module bothers you that much, I'm happy to move it to off of this list. Cheers, Vern Ceder Arthur wrote: > > > >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > One argument against an "official" turtle.py module, is that it will be the > Phone Company's Turtle, and the forces of agility and merit will be lost. > To me it is better if folks wanting a serious turtle graphics implementation > expect to look for it outside the standard distribution. > > I am perfectly aware that my approach to these discussion is not likely to > get me liked. Kirby, we know, is weird ;). > > But if I had no passion around the issues that arise, it would be easy > enough to approach the discussions otherwise. Probably my approach is > Anti-Effective - so the "serious" discussion is perceived to be the one that > is held without any overt passion. Too bad. > > Art > > > _______________________________________________ > Edu-sig mailing list > Edu-sig@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig -- This time for sure! -Bullwinkle J. Moose ----------------------------- Vern Ceder, Director of Technology Canterbury School, 3210 Smith Road, Ft Wayne, IN 46804 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 260-436-0746; FAX: 260-436-5137 _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig