----- Original Message ----- From: Vern Ceder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I was asked submit the enhacements by Raymond Hettinger. I > foolishly > thought it might be good to ask for input on the nature of the > improvements before doing so. If you want to have an argument > about > whethe turtle.py should be in the standard library at all, I would > suggest you file a PEP or discuss it with the BDFL. It's far > beyond me. >
Just to be clearer, I have assumed that the turtle.py module in the standaerd library is exactly the turtle.py module that the BDFL had judged was appropriate for the standard library. And I never had a problem with it. It is appropriately minimal. IMO, a less minimal one is less appropriate. Do you think I am arguing to argue, or do you at least believe that I mean what I say. And for reasons that may be judged wrong, but are not outlandish in any possible way. Which is why I think a PEP might be nice to see if there is anyone else out there who sees it as I do. Besides the fact that - before the issuance of the new memo I didn't get - that ,at least arguably, would just represent adherence to SOP. Art _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
