[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Vern Ceder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>I was asked submit the enhacements by Raymond Hettinger. I >>foolishly >>thought it might be good to ask for input on the nature of the >>improvements before doing so. If you want to have an argument >>about >>whethe turtle.py should be in the standard library at all, I would >>suggest you file a PEP or discuss it with the BDFL. It's far >>beyond me. >> > > > Just to be clearer, I have assumed that the turtle.py module in the standaerd > library > is exactly the turtle.py module that the BDFL had judged was appropriate for > the standard library. And I never had a problem with it. It is > appropriately minimal. > > IMO, a less minimal one is less appropriate.
This statement seems to me, at least to say, a bit arrogant. Did you ever use turtle.py in an educational setting? If so you surely had a different view! You knew, for instance, that it has a number of serious bugs. Things like this you call "approriately minimal". Might it be rewarding for you, to supplement your opinion about turtle.py with some practical experience? Regards, Gregor > Do you think I am arguing to argue, or do you at least believe that I mean > what I say. And for reasons that may be judged wrong, but are not outlandish > in > any possible way. > > Which is why I think a PEP might be nice to see if there is anyone else out > there who sees it as I do. > > Besides the fact that - before the issuance of the new memo I didn't get - > that ,at least > arguably, would just represent adherence to SOP. > > > Art > _______________________________________________ > Edu-sig mailing list > Edu-sig@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig > > -- Gregor Lingl Reisnerstrasse 3/19 A-1030 Wien Telefon: +43 1 713 33 98 Mobil: +43 664 140 35 27 Website: python4kids.net _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
