On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Rehno Lindeque <rehno.linde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This grey list would be backed by a clear process of getting things on the >> list that would include a checklist of mandatory things. >> This checklist would be like a rule list and breaking any of the rule >> would have to happen after a serious benefits analysis done under the >> supervision of that experienced Elm programmers group I mentioned earlier. >> > > If this were the route people decide to take, I get the impression that > this is the sort of thing elm-community does quite well. Perhaps a > "greylist" could be simplified to https://github.com/elm-community/*. > Of course, that would be the optimal course. I guess this would make the packages a very light shade of grey, closer to something semi-official than something apocryphal. :) -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
