Yes i think stuart is right, sometime ago in a similar discussion someone
told me the same, the there are two different motors for turning or milling.

Well, the only question left then is if i can use spindle synchronised
motion, at very low speed (10 rpm or less), and a mill in the X axis to make
a lobe/cam shape?

The finish process it will be as always in a cam grinder so the main problem
is how to make a fast rough milling.

Thanks again for your answer.

Regards.

2010/5/5 Stuart Stevenson <stus...@gmail.com>

> Gentlemen,
> I have zero experience with these machines. I have watched machines such as
> this. It appeared to me as if the spindle 'changed' gears between the
> turning and milling operations. I assumed a worm drive was
> engaged/disengaged for the different cutting requirements.
> Just saying.
> Stuart
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Andy Pugh <a...@andypugh.fsnet.co.uk
> >wrote:
>
> > On 5 May 2010 15:47, John Kasunich <jmkasun...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> >
> > > Just because a particular motor works well driving the spindle
> > > in lathe mode does NOT mean it will be even close to good enough
> > > for direct drive positioning.
> >
> > A good point, I have only been discussing what is technically possible in
> > EMC.
> >
> > I am fairly sure that various lathes do exactly what is being
> > proposed, but how much such spindle drives cost is something I could
> > not even speculate on.
> > This machine does it, it also looks quite expensive :-)
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZcFMjLmjZc&feature=related
> >
> > <thinking aloud>
> >
> > I would guess that there is a risk of the flute-frequency setting off
> > oscillations in the controller.
> >
> > For the proposed application (rough-milling cams) the rotary stiffness
> > requirements might not be all that exacting.
> >
> > I suppose in principle, with a fast-enough X axis and enough low-speed
> > spindle torque you can machine cams with a conventional turning
> > operation and spindle-synchronised motion.
> >
> > I think this might be one of those applications where a small-budget
> > proof-of concept might be a good idea, though the problem here is that
> > it might be something where you need the expensive stuff (high torque
> > servo, high-count encoder) to make it work.
> >
> > > Good PID tuning might be able to reduce the steady state error,
> > > but when an individual flute of a spinning end mill applies a
> > > brief force to the axis, the axis will move.  Only after it moves
> > > will there be a position error that the PID can use to drive the
> > > axis back to the proper position.
> >
> > I wonder if a Resolver (and high-resolution interface electronics)
> > might be a better bet than an encoder?
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.analog.com/en/other-products/militaryaerospace/ad2s80a/products/product.html
> >
> > Is a 16-bit converter and claims +/- 2 arcmin resolution. on 50mm
> > diameter material I think that is 0.015mm (0.0005")  tangential
> > resolution. Say 4 counts to produce a PID response and it is probably
> > good enough for end-mill roughing a cam with live tooling, but not for
> > some other operations you might think of. (I am imagining the cutter
> > axis at right angles to the spindle axis and on the same plane, the
> > stiffness requirements with the axes parallel strike me as more of a
> > challenge)
> >
> > --
> > atp
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> dos centavos
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to