Ubuntu 10 seemed significantly slower than Ubuntu 8 on exact same hardware.  
storage space is a sort of peripheral issue.  bloating is along the lines of 
processing resources required for given task i think.  i seem to recall that 
opening a file on a trs80 took very little time.

--- On Wed, 11/23/11, Jack Coats <j...@coats.org> wrote:


From: Jack Coats <j...@coats.org>
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Next distribution after Ubuntu 10.04 LTS is no longer 
supported?
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wednesday, November 23, 2011, 5:26 PM


Andy,
  I was not trying to suggest EMC2 is bloated, but with the newer
releases of Ubuntu, I have heard reports that they are becoming
bloated.

  My thoughts were that EMC2 is with a fairly trim distribution
(Ubuntu 10.04LTS) and should make sure the partner we pair with is
similarly endowed.

  Boy, I'm glad my wife isn't saying that about me.  I would hate to
be replaced by Husband2.0 :)

... Jack

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to