On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:40:43 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Sergey Semernin > <sergey.semer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s", ici->file); > > i know the code before was like that, but it would be better to use > ecore_strlcpy() instead of snprintf() with "%s". I improved that in > svn. in this case i consider it a "doesn't matter" issue - if its not a performance critical path - the difference is pretty much not worth worrying too much about :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
