On 12/02/13 22:44, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:32:59 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin <be...@meleeweb.net> said: > >> D'ar gwener 08 a viz C'hwevrer 2013 e 03 eur 35, « Carsten Haitzler » he deus >> skrivet : >>> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:35:07 -0600 ravenlock <ravenl...@ravenlock.us> said: >>> >>>> On 1/30/13 5:32 AM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> For e5 buildbot/whatever we will need different OS and architecture to >>>>> test. So if some volunteer are free to build some, we can gladly host >>>>> them. >>>>> >>>>> Needed OS : >>>>> >>>>> - Windows XP x86 >>>>> - Windows XP x86_64 >>>>> - Windows Vista x86_64 >>>>> - Windows 7 x86_64 >>>>> - Windows 8 x86_64 >>>> >>>> What is the plan for licensing the above? >>> >>> someone needs to actually pay for a proper license/copy. there is no way i >>> will allow us to use pirated copies of any software on our infra. if we ask >>> people to respect our licenses, be they bsd, gpl or anything else, then we >>> will respect theirs, regardless if they are open or not. >>> >>>>> (maybe more declination are needed ?) >>>>> >>>>> - Mac OS X Snow Leopard >>>>> - Mac OS X Lion >>>>> - Mac OS X Mountain Lion >>>> >>>> This is easy and do'able if you have the Mac hardware and Parallels. >>>> Refurbed Mac Minis are like $500, you can stuff 16GB in them and a 1TB >>>> disk. Works perfectly well. Once upon a time there were E-funds being >>>> held. We might tap into those? >>> >>> he's asking for vm's, not hardware. we can't do squat diddly with a mac >>> mini. our server is in a rack in a server room/colo in oregon. :) i know - >>> osx expressly forbids being used on anything other than apple hardware (vm's >>> included). >> >> On Illiad datacenter (where e3 and e4 are), we can add some hardware >> devices (no more than 1U tall) > > oh cool - though that is a different matter imho - not "e5" related as that's > over in oregon (osuosl). :) > >>> something installed with network running and preferably everything up to and >>> including x running and working within the vm >> >> Why is a X needed as running ? Librairies should be sufficient. > > test suites will need to be able to RUN apps ans do things like screenshot. > exactness relies on this to replay recorded events then take screenshots for > comparison. sure - xvfb will deal with this too - just the same, but no distro > these days sets up x to listen on port 6000 anyway - so its local only (uni > sockets) so not a security issue anyway.. and its behind a nat anyway even if > it did listen on port 6000... but we would need a working x setup to do things > like test login sessions, entrance for example etc. and we can feed in events > remotely. >
Exactness doesn't need X. IIRC we changed it to use the buffer engine. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
