On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:55:52 +0000 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> said:
> On 12/02/13 22:44, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:32:59 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin <be...@meleeweb.net> > > said: > > > >> D'ar gwener 08 a viz C'hwevrer 2013 e 03 eur 35, « Carsten Haitzler » he > >> deus skrivet : > >>> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:35:07 -0600 ravenlock <ravenl...@ravenlock.us> > >>> said: > >>> > >>>> On 1/30/13 5:32 AM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> For e5 buildbot/whatever we will need different OS and architecture to > >>>>> test. So if some volunteer are free to build some, we can gladly host > >>>>> them. > >>>>> > >>>>> Needed OS : > >>>>> > >>>>> - Windows XP x86 > >>>>> - Windows XP x86_64 > >>>>> - Windows Vista x86_64 > >>>>> - Windows 7 x86_64 > >>>>> - Windows 8 x86_64 > >>>> > >>>> What is the plan for licensing the above? > >>> > >>> someone needs to actually pay for a proper license/copy. there is no way i > >>> will allow us to use pirated copies of any software on our infra. if we > >>> ask people to respect our licenses, be they bsd, gpl or anything else, > >>> then we will respect theirs, regardless if they are open or not. > >>> > >>>>> (maybe more declination are needed ?) > >>>>> > >>>>> - Mac OS X Snow Leopard > >>>>> - Mac OS X Lion > >>>>> - Mac OS X Mountain Lion > >>>> > >>>> This is easy and do'able if you have the Mac hardware and Parallels. > >>>> Refurbed Mac Minis are like $500, you can stuff 16GB in them and a 1TB > >>>> disk. Works perfectly well. Once upon a time there were E-funds being > >>>> held. We might tap into those? > >>> > >>> he's asking for vm's, not hardware. we can't do squat diddly with a mac > >>> mini. our server is in a rack in a server room/colo in oregon. :) i know - > >>> osx expressly forbids being used on anything other than apple hardware > >>> (vm's included). > >> > >> On Illiad datacenter (where e3 and e4 are), we can add some hardware > >> devices (no more than 1U tall) > > > > oh cool - though that is a different matter imho - not "e5" related as > > that's over in oregon (osuosl). :) > > > >>> something installed with network running and preferably everything up to > >>> and including x running and working within the vm > >> > >> Why is a X needed as running ? Librairies should be sufficient. > > > > test suites will need to be able to RUN apps ans do things like screenshot. > > exactness relies on this to replay recorded events then take screenshots for > > comparison. sure - xvfb will deal with this too - just the same, but no > > distro these days sets up x to listen on port 6000 anyway - so its local > > only (uni sockets) so not a security issue anyway.. and its behind a nat > > anyway even if it did listen on port 6000... but we would need a working x > > setup to do things like test login sessions, entrance for example etc. and > > we can feed in events remotely. > > > > Exactness doesn't need X. IIRC we changed it to use the buffer engine. it used to need x... :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
