> From a packagers perspective it would be great if we could keep the
> efl, elementary and evas/emotion_generic_loaders version numbers the
> same even if there are no changes, the same as we did for the 1.7 tree.
> I'll leave it for you guys to decide though.

+ 1




2013/12/9 Simon <si...@simotek.net>

> On 12/09/2013 08:33 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 20:05, Simon wrote:
> >> On 12/09/2013 05:40 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >>> Hello.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 14:58, Jeff Hoogland wrote:
> >>>> Just wanted to confirm emotion generic players isn't getting a 1.8.1
> >>>> release.
> >>> Confirmed. Emotion generic players had not a single commit since
> >>> 1.8.0. Nothing to release.
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> Stefan Schmidt
> >>   From a packagers perspective it would be great if we could keep the
> >> efl, elementary and evas/emotion_generic_loaders version numbers the
> >> same even if there are no changes, the same as we did for the 1.7 tree.
> >> I'll leave it for you guys to decide though.
> > I was pondering about that. For 1.7.x we had way more tarballs for one
> > release. Due to the merged efl tree this really got down.
> >
> > Would you expect emotion generic player release tarballs for 1.8.1 and
> > 1.8.2 even when not a single commit hit that repo?
> >
> > We can switch back to that model but I'm not a fan of doing "empty"
> > releases just to stay in sync for the version number.
> >
> > It would only heppen from 1.8.3 though. Skipping a minor release for
> > everything but efl. IT will always be out of sync with e18 in any
> > case.
> >
> > In sumarry I have no hard feeling in any direction. :)
> >
> > regards
> > Stefan Schmidt
> >
> I wasn't much of a fan of the empty releases at first either, but
> realistic the enlightenment foundation libraries are efl, elementary and
> e*_generic_loaders, its just some components are built separately
> because its easier and others due to licensing. From a user perspective
> particularly in regards to filing bugs it makes it easier if they all
> follow the same versioning, especially if efl and elementary are out of
> sync.
> I understand and treat Enlightenment as a different thing and that i
> understand.
> Cheers
> Simon
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> Download it for free now!
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK 
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to